Blog
The weakness of weak ties
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
I have just submitted an article for publication entitled ”The weakness of weak ties: personal media and social leadership in a Malaysian suburb”. Many thanks to those of you who’ve contributed to earlier versions of this text. As always, I look forward to your views. I have Google-docked the draft article here and what follows is the abstract (Update 19 April 2009 - see also scribd version):
This article draws from fieldwork in a Malaysian suburb to investigate whether personal media (email, laptops, blogs, mobile phones, etc.) are making any significant difference to local leadership practices. I argue that residential politics does not provide fertile ground for the growth of ‘networked individualism’ – the claim that contemporary social relations are being reconfigured around individuals (Wellman, Castells). Instead of egocentrism, leaders’ personal media practices sustain a sociocentric field of residential politics around ‘community’ issues such as waste disposal and petty crime. Leaders exploit the affordances of personal media (portability, ubiquity, personalisation, etc.) to derive strength from their weak ties (Granovetter) and further their public careers. Yet when operating within the field of residential politics they must align their personal media practices with the field’s egalitarian doxa and communitarian media.
See http://www.scribd.com/doc/14428606/Postill-the-Weakness-of-Weak-Ties-
From activist networks (1990s) to social network sites (2000s)
Sunday, September 21, 2008
In an earlier post I mentioned a number of anthropologists who in the 1990s ‘found’ networks in the field when working with transnational activists, NGO workers or technocrats who were enthusiastic about networks (e.g. Edelman 2005, Green et al 2005, Juris 2008, Knox et al 2006, Riles 2000). After all, it was in the 1990s that the network metaphor took off around the globe, especially in domains such as development, governance, and activism.
In the 2000s, a different type of network has caught the media and academic imagination, namely social network(ing) sites such as Friendster, Myspace, Cyworld or Facebook. What can anthropologists learn from the earlier wave of network studies as they join other specialists in the study of social network sites? My own hunch is that ‘networks’ (whatever these elusive entities may be) could turn out not to be the more significant social formations in these social worlds. Think, for instance, of the salience of university cohorts, peer groups, workplaces and fields of professional practice in a site such as Facebook. Yes, Facebook users certainly create and maintain a range of social ties through this site, but in doing so these users are operating within and across fields of practice, workplaces, cohorts and so on.
Or consider the fact that on the music sharing site Last.fm there are two distinct categories of significant others, namely ‘friends’ (i.e. contacts) and ‘neighbours’ (people with whom you share a taste in music on the basis of your digital trail on the site). In other words, the builders of Last.fm have recognised the crucial importance of two very different sociological principles: promixity in social network terms and proximity in socio-discursive space (musical taste). It’s as if these intrepid builders had attempted to reconcile social network analysis with Bourdieu’s theory of taste.
References
Edelman, M. 2005 “When Networks Don’t Work: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Civil Society Initiatives in Central America,” pp. 29-45 in Social Movements: An Anthropological Reader, June Nash, ed.. London: Blackwell.
Green, S., Harvey, P. and H. Knox (2005) ‘Scales of Place and Networks: an Ethnography of the Imperative to Connect through Information and Communications Technologies’, Current Anthropology 46(5):805-826
Juris, J.S. 2008. Networking Futures: the Movements against Corporate Globalization. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
Knox, H., Savage, M. & Harvey, P. (2006). Social networks and the study of relations:. networks as method, metaphor and form. Economy and Society, 35(1)
Riles, A. (2000) The Network Inside Out. University of Michigan Press
http://johnpostill.wordpress.com/2008/09/14/from-activist-networks-199